Category: Psychology

I don’t understand this Psychology question and need help to study.I need an explanation for this Psychology question to help me study.The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires that specific topics be covered in an Individualized Education Program (IEP) meeting. The IEP team consists of general education teachers, special education teachers, a psychologist or counselor, administrators, parents/guardians, speech therapist, occupational therapist, and on occasion, the student and student advocate. Typically, a special education teacher serves as the case manager and is responsible for inviting attendees to the meeting and coordinating the meeting according to policies and regulations. Effective communication, interpersonal skills, problem solving skills, and data-driven decision-making are all prerequisites to facilitating a successful IEP meeting. Often, a school district will provide a checklist for teams to follow when developing and discussing the IEP to help ensure all responsibilities are met.View “FIEP: A Facilitated IEP Meeting,” paying special attention to the structure and collaborative nature of the meeting, the specific components of the IEP, and ways that the meeting demonstrates adherence to laws and ethical principles that govern special education. Note when viewing this example meeting that the administrator is the facilitator rather than the special education teacher, who would typically lead the meeting.In a 1,000-1,250 word essay, articulate your knowledge of IDEA and the IEP process. The essay should address the following:Summarize IDEA. Include discussion of professional practice standards and how these are used to guide the special education teacher in ensuring key components of the law such as free appropriate public education (FAPE), appropriate evaluation, least restrictive environment (LRE), and procedural safeguards are upheld (approximately 250 words).
Explain the importance of collaboration between members of the IEP team. Include discussion about who should be included on the IEP team, how parents and students participate in decision-making, which IEP team members’ attendance is required and which is optional, and how CEC Ethical Principles and Professional Practice Standards guide collaboration and execution of the IEP process (approximately 250 words).
Describe the IEP process. Explain what IDEA indicates must be done before, during, and after an IEP meeting. Include discussion of why executing the IEP process according to the established standards is essential to avoid due process disputes (approximately 250-500 words).
Identify the major components of the IEP and explain why each is important. Discuss the specific legal, ethical, and policy responsibilities related to developing the IEP to ensure it meets the educational, developmental, and medical services requirements for students with disabilities and their families. (approximately 250 words)
Consider what you saw in “FIEP: A Facilitated IEP Meeting” and describe the key takeaways you will consider as a new teacher participating in the IEP process (approximately 100 words).
Support the essay with a minimum of THREE scholarly resources.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Guide.Requirements: SEE REQUIREMENTS
Requirements: 1000-1250 words

I need an explanation for this Psychology question to help me study.The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires that specific topics be covered in an Individualized Education Program (IEP) meeting. The IEP team consists of general education teachers, special education teachers, a psychologist or counselor, administrators, parents/guardians, speech therapist, occupational therapist, and on occasion, the student and student advocate. Typically, a special education teacher serves as the case manager and is responsible for inviting attendees to the meeting and coordinating the meeting according to policies and regulations. Effective communication, interpersonal skills, problem solving skills, and data-driven decision-making are all prerequisites to facilitating a successful IEP meeting. Often, a school district will provide a checklist for teams to follow when developing and discussing the IEP to help ensure all responsibilities are met.View “FIEP: A Facilitated IEP Meeting,” paying special attention to the structure and collaborative nature of the meeting, the specific components of the IEP, and ways that the meeting demonstrates adherence to laws and ethical principles that govern special education. Note when viewing this example meeting that the administrator is the facilitator rather than the special education teacher, who would typically lead the meeting. In a 1,000-1,250 word essay, articulate your knowledge of IDEA and the IEP process. The essay should address the following:Summarize IDEA. Include discussion of professional practice standards and how these are used to guide the special education teacher in ensuring key components of the law such as free appropriate public education (FAPE), appropriate evaluation, least restrictive environment (LRE), and procedural safeguards are upheld (approximately 250 words).
Explain the importance of collaboration between members of the IEP team. Include discussion about who should be included on the IEP team, how parents and students participate in decision-making, which IEP team members’ attendance is required and which is optional, and how CEC Ethical Principles and Professional Practice Standards guide collaboration and execution of the IEP process (approximately 250 words).
Describe the IEP process. Explain what IDEA indicates must be done before, during, and after an IEP meeting. Include discussion of why executing the IEP process according to the established standards is essential to avoid due process disputes (approximately 250-500 words).
Identify the major components of the IEP and explain why each is important. Discuss the specific legal, ethical, and policy responsibilities related to developing the IEP to ensure it meets the educational, developmental, and medical services requirements for students with disabilities and their families. (approximately 250 words)
Consider what you saw in “FIEP: A Facilitated IEP Meeting” and describe the key takeaways you will consider as a new teacher participating in the IEP process (approximately 100 words).
Support the essay with a minimum of THREE scholarly resources.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Guide.
Requirements: SEE REQUIREMENTS

I’m studying for my Psychology class and need an explanation.Article Critique – Reliability, validity and scale analysis (Quantitative)The practice of quantitative research not only involves statistical calculations and formulas but also involves the understanding of statistical techniques related to real-world applications. You might not become a quantitative researcher nor use statistical methods in your profession but as a consumer, citizen, and scholar-practitioner, it will be important for you to become a critical consumer of research, which will empower you to read, interpret, and evaluate the strength of claims made in scholarly material and daily news.For this Assignment, you will critically evaluate a scholarly article related to reliability, validity, and scale analysis.To prepareReview the Article Critique Assignment Guide in the Walden Library, listed in the Week 2 Learning Resources.https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/rsch8260/week2a…
Search the Walden Library for a quantitative article that utilizes scales.https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library
By Day 7The AssignmentWrite a 3- to 4-page critique of the research you found in the Walden Library that includes responses to the following prompts:Did the authors construct scales in a clear, concise manner?
Were the authors’ explanations clear regarding the reliability and validity of their measures?
What information did the authors provide about establishing reliability and validity?
Requirements: Analytical Review | 3 pages, Double spaced

I’m studying for my Psychology class and need an explanation.Organizational Injustice and Deviant BehaviorDeviant workplace behaviors are employee behaviors that violate organizational norms. These behaviors can manifest as corruption on a large scale, but more often they are subtler erosions of time and productivity, for example through chronic lateness. These behaviors can impact the following areas: production (e.g., cyber-loafing), property (e.g., theft), politics (e.g., supervisor asking an employee to work outside his or her job description), or personal (e.g., bullying). There are myriad reasons why employees exhibit deviant behaviors: feeling slighted, underutilized, or treated unfairly. Feelings of injustice have been associated with deviant behaviors. Think about how perceptions of injustice and the resulting organizational deviant behavior can be addressed by organizational leadership.In this Discussion, you will explore the effects of deviant behavior on an organization and consider strategies for addressing them.To prepare for this Discussion:Consider the various types of organizational deviant behavior, including possible reasons and consequences.
Read the article “An Empirical Study Analyzing Job Productivity in Toxic Workplace Environments.” Reflect on what would happen if a toxic environment, resulting from a climate of deviant behavior, is left unchecked.
Read the article “Disentangling the Relationship Between Implicit Aggressiveness and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Role of Job Attitudes.” Consider the role of individual characteristics (or traits) such as aggressiveness or feelings of injustice and how it relates to other counterproductive work behavior.
Read the article “The Dark Triad and Workplace Behavior.” Consider the “dark triad” of workplace behaviors and the type of organizational climate that can exacerbate them.
Read the article “The Dark Side of Personality Predicts Positive and Negative Work Attitudes.” Identify personal traits and the effect, both positive and negative, they can have in an organization.
Read the article “Surveying the Forest: A Meta‐Analysis, Moderator Investigation, and Future‐Oriented Discussion of the Antecedents of Voluntary Employee Turnover.” Consider how justice can mediate commitment and withdrawal cognitions. Read the article “Understanding and Mitigating Cynicism the Workplace.” Consider leadership and supervisory behaviors that can help mitigate deviant behaviors in the workplace.
Read the article “Where the Bullies Are.” Reflect on the conditions that might increase the likelihood of bullying behavior and what can be done to address it before it negatively impacts the organization.
By Day 5Post a response to the following:Provide an example of one organizational deviant behavior and explain why it is deviant. Explain whether perceptions of injustice lead to organizational deviant behavior or whether there could be other sources of this deviant behavior. How could your example of deviant behavior impact the organization? Are there ways organizations can offset the negative effects of deviant behavior? Explain. (Use APA 7th Edition)ReferencesAnjum, A., Ming, X., Siddiqi, A. F., & Rasool, S. F. (2018). An empirical study analyzing job productivity in toxic workplace environments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(5), 1035. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.3390/ijerph15051035Galić, Z., Ružojčić, M., Jerneić, Ž., & Tonković Grabovac, M. (2018). Disentangling the relationship between implicit aggressiveness and counterproductive work behaviors: The role of job attitudes. Human Performance, 31(2), 77–96. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1080/08959285.2018.1455686LeBreton, J. M., Shiverdecker, L. K., & Grimaldi, E. M. (2018). The dark triad and workplace behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 387–414. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104451 Palaiou, K., Zarola, A., & Furnham, A. (2016). The dark side of personality predicts positive and negative work attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 12–16. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.029
Requirements: Discussion | 1 pages, Double spaced

Need help with my Psychology question – I’m studying for my class.watch video and answer the two questions below it.According to the speaker, how does procrastination work? How does the speaker suggest addressing procrastination? Journal Section 2: Connections answer the three questionsIn
In the next section of your journal entry, make connections between
procrastination and what you’ve learned about coping and motivation.
Before completing this template, you may want to review the information
on the following pages:Proactive Coping
Self-Determination Theory In what ways is procrastination a negative form of coping? In what ways is procrastination a positive form of coping? How might being intrinsically or extrinsically motivated relate to procrastination? Journal Section 3: Resilience answer the 3 questions below.For this last section, think of a friend you have in real life who struggles with procrastination. What advice would you give this friend to help them build resilience and reframe procrastination so that it is adaptive? Before completing this section, you may want to review the information on the following pages:Adaptive and Maladaptive EmotionsResilience
When might procrastination be considered a good thing? According to the speaker, how can our inner “rational decision-maker” and “instant gratification seeker” coexist? How do you think we can reframe procrastination in a more adaptive way to promote resilience?
Requirements: short and sweet

Help me study for my Psychology class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.REMEMBER: to earn the full 10 points each week, you need to respond to one of the prompts (5 pts) by Wednesday and then reply to one of your peers’ posts (5 pts) by Sunday. You may reply to a peer who chose a different prompt. Discussion board posts will be graded leniently: if you are making a good-faith effort to follow instructions, you will get full credit.Read the (short) article called the 1943 Guide to Hiring Women: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/crass-transportation/ (Links to an external site.)For your initial response, assume that managers actually followed this guide. Choose ONE of these three prompts:Give an example of distributive injustice that might result, and explain why it is distributive injustice.
Give an example of procedural injustice that might result, and explain why it is procedural injustice.
Give an example of interactional injustice that might result, and explain why it is interactional injustice.
For your reply to a peer,state whether you agree or disagree with their example (and why), and
give your own example of that type of injustice (which doesn’t have to be from this crazy hiring guide for women – it can be from your experience, something you read, something you made up… anything).
Requirements: …..